Hi Shijie, >From: Jagan Teki [mailto:jagannadh.teki@xxxxxxxxx] [...] > >I feel these are good points to discuss all. >1. With new framework seems like we need two separate controller drivers > one for non spi-nor and one for spi-nor with single controller hw >2. With spi-nor implementation though the hw is spi complaint but the sw is > completely ignoring the Linux SPI core interaction. > >I feel above two points are technically wrong - Please correct me if am wrong >but need all developers will join..thanks! > I have been following this patch-set from sometime, And I think point (2) has been discussed back and forth in multiple times in earlier discussions. So, Is it possible for you to summarize point (2) with all pros-n-cons ? - A README will helpful to clear all doubts and will ease your implementation as well. - It will also help in reducing turn-around time to get this framework in acceptable state and still keep it generic enough. You can submit the README as Documentation/mtd/spi-nor.txt with regards, pekon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
