On Sun, 12 Jan 2014 20:26:21 +0100 Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 01/12/2014 07:51 PM, Jean-Francois Moine wrote: > > On Sat, 11 Jan 2014 19:35:21 +0100 > > Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> At least for the DT part, I'd suggest to not ask for interrupt directly > >> but use a proper gpios property. The can of course be converted to > >> priv->int_irq in some tda998x_dt_probe. > > > > May you give me more information? > > Sure, see [1]. > > [1] http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2013-May/038822.html Thanks for the link, but I still don't see the advantage of the gpio (which value?) over the irq number. -- Ken ar c'hentañ | ** Breizh ha Linux atav! ** Jef | http://moinejf.free.fr/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html