On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 9:39 PM, Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 07:50:52PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: >> The Cortina Gemini pin controller uses the standard pin control >> bindings for muxing functions with groups so these bindings >> should be entirely uncontroversial. >> >> Cc: devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> .../bindings/pinctrl/cortina,gemini-pinctrl.txt | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/cortina,gemini-pinctrl.txt >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/cortina,gemini-pinctrl.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/cortina,gemini-pinctrl.txt >> new file mode 100644 >> index 000000000000..2ef3e8a65559 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/cortina,gemini-pinctrl.txt >> @@ -0,0 +1,54 @@ >> +Cortina Systems Gemini pin controller >> + >> +This pin controller is found in the Cortina Systems Gemini SoC family, >> +see further arm/gemini.txt. It is a purely group-based multiplexing pin >> +controller. >> + >> +Required properties: >> +- compatible: "cortina,gemini-pinctrl" >> +- regmap: phandle to the system controller node > > Why not a child of the system controller? It is a child of the system controller, I just didn't show that in the example. And it's true, then I can just look it up from the parent. I'll revise. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
