On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 07:50:52PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > The Cortina Gemini pin controller uses the standard pin control > bindings for muxing functions with groups so these bindings > should be entirely uncontroversial. > > Cc: devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > .../bindings/pinctrl/cortina,gemini-pinctrl.txt | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/cortina,gemini-pinctrl.txt > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/cortina,gemini-pinctrl.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/cortina,gemini-pinctrl.txt > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..2ef3e8a65559 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/cortina,gemini-pinctrl.txt > @@ -0,0 +1,54 @@ > +Cortina Systems Gemini pin controller > + > +This pin controller is found in the Cortina Systems Gemini SoC family, > +see further arm/gemini.txt. It is a purely group-based multiplexing pin > +controller. > + > +Required properties: > +- compatible: "cortina,gemini-pinctrl" > +- regmap: phandle to the system controller node Why not a child of the system controller? Rob -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
