Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] dt-bindings: Interconnect device-tree bindings draft

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Hi Rob,

On 06/30/2017 12:32 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 08:49:03PM +0300, Georgi Djakov wrote:
>> The interconnect API is not yet using DT bindings for expressing
>> the relations between the API consumers and providers. This is
>> posted a separate patch as it needs further discussions on how
>> to represent this with DT.
> 
> I would recommend continuing to sort out how this works within the 
> kernel before fixing things in DT. Something like this needs to be a 
> core binding in the DT spec.

Yes, that's the plan. Do you prefer me to drop this patch for now?

> 
> Also, you should CC some ARM, Ltd. folks like Mark R and Lorenzo. 
> There's been some discussion in the past how to describe the DMA master 
> side of the bus topology.

Thanks for the information! I will CC them on the next version!

BR,
Georgi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux