From: Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 19:02:38 +0200 > On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 12:23:49PM -0400, David Miller wrote: >> From: Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@xxxxxxxxx> >> Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 11:28:01 +0200 >> >> > The current way to find if the phy is internal is to compare DT phy-mode >> > and emac_variant/internal_phy. >> > But it will negate a possible future SoC where an external PHY use the >> > same phy mode than the internal one. >> > >> > By using phy-mode = "internal" we permit to have an external PHY with >> > the same mode than the internal one. >> > >> > Reported-by: André Przywara <andre.przywara@xxxxxxx> >> > Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@xxxxxxxxx> >> >> Series applied. >> >> Please provide a proper "[PATCH 0/n] " header posting next time. > > Sorry could you wait for applying, there are a parallel thread (http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg183520.html) and it seems finaly that internal could not be the good way to do it. > > Regards > Sorry again, I should have sent a comment for waiting. Please send me a revert patch, when I say I've applied it I already pushed it out to my GIT tree. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
