On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 12:23:49PM -0400, David Miller wrote: > From: Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@xxxxxxxxx> > Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 11:28:01 +0200 > > > The current way to find if the phy is internal is to compare DT phy-mode > > and emac_variant/internal_phy. > > But it will negate a possible future SoC where an external PHY use the > > same phy mode than the internal one. > > > > By using phy-mode = "internal" we permit to have an external PHY with > > the same mode than the internal one. > > > > Reported-by: André Przywara <andre.przywara@xxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@xxxxxxxxx> > > Series applied. > > Please provide a proper "[PATCH 0/n] " header posting next time. Sorry could you wait for applying, there are a parallel thread (http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg183520.html) and it seems finaly that internal could not be the good way to do it. Regards Sorry again, I should have sent a comment for waiting. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
