On 06/27/2017 07:36 AM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 07:46:34PM +0200, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>> Am 26.06.2017 um 18:31 schrieb Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxx>:
>>>
>>> Hi Hugues,
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 05:05:38PM +0200, Hugues Fruchet wrote:
>>>> @@ -1545,15 +1577,22 @@ static int ov965x_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> static const struct i2c_device_id ov965x_id[] = {
>>>> - { "OV9650", 0 },
>>>> - { "OV9652", 0 },
>>>> + { "OV9650", 0x9650 },
>>>> + { "OV9652", 0x9652 },
>>>
>>> This change does not appear to match with the patch description nor it the
>>> information is used. How about not changing it, unless there's a reason to?
>>> The same for the data field of the of_device_id array below.
>>
>> I think it could/should be used to check if the camera chip that is found
>> by reading the product-id and version registers does match what the device
>> tree expects and abort probing on a mismatch.
>
> Makes sense. But it should be a separate patch, shouldn't it?
>
> You could also put the id to the ops struct, and choose the ops struct that
> way. Entirely up to you.
>
I'll suggest to skip the id check between DT compatible string and real
device id read from sensor, this is not something I see in other drivers
currently.
But I would suggest to keep in a separate patch the switch of device id
names to lower case in order to align with other omnivision cameras and
not introduce upper/lower case potential bugs in DT later on (as the one
encountered by Nikolaus):
[media] ov9650: switch i2c device id to lower case
static const struct i2c_device_id ov965x_id[] = {
- { "OV9650", 0 },
- { "OV9652", 0 },
+ { "ov9650", 0 },
+ { "ov9652", 0 },
[media] ov9650: add device tree support
+static const struct of_device_id ov965x_of_match[] = {
+ { .compatible = "ovti,ov9650", },
+ { .compatible = "ovti,ov9652", },
+ { /* sentinel */ }
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ov965x_of_match);
+
static struct i2c_driver ov965x_i2c_driver = {
.driver = {
.name = DRIVER_NAME,
+ .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(ov965x_of_match),
��.n��������+%������w��{.n����z�{��ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
