Hi Hugues,
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 05:05:38PM +0200, Hugues Fruchet wrote:
> @@ -1545,15 +1577,22 @@ static int ov965x_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
> }
>
> static const struct i2c_device_id ov965x_id[] = {
> - { "OV9650", 0 },
> - { "OV9652", 0 },
> + { "OV9650", 0x9650 },
> + { "OV9652", 0x9652 },
This change does not appear to match with the patch description nor it the
information is used. How about not changing it, unless there's a reason to?
The same for the data field of the of_device_id array below.
> { /* sentinel */ }
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, ov965x_id);
>
> +static const struct of_device_id ov965x_of_match[] = {
> + { .compatible = "ovti,ov9650", .data = (void *)0x9650 },
> + { .compatible = "ovti,ov9652", .data = (void *)0x9652 },
> + { /* sentinel */ }
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ov965x_of_match);
> static struct i2c_driver ov965x_i2c_driver = {
> .driver = {
> .name = DRIVER_NAME,
> + .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(ov965x_of_match),
> },
> .probe = ov965x_probe,
> .remove = ov965x_remove,
--
Regards,
Sakari Ailus
e-mail: sakari.ailus@xxxxxx XMPP: sailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
