On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 11:00:11AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 06:01:49PM +0800, Jeffy Chen wrote: > > Update document devicetree bindings to support "wakeup-source" property. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > > > Changes in v3: None > > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-bus.txt | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-bus.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-bus.txt > > index 1f6e86f..0fa1ccf 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-bus.txt > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-bus.txt > > @@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ All slave nodes can contain the following optional properties: > > Defaults to 1 if not present. > > - spi-rx-delay-us - Microsecond delay after a read transfer. > > - spi-tx-delay-us - Microsecond delay after a write transfer. > > +- wakeup-source - Device can be used as a wakeup source. > > wakeup-source is valid for any device with an interrupts property > already, so I don't think this is necessary. Do you mean it is not necessary on SPI level or not necessary at all? Or you disagree with wording? Because we do need a way to say that on given platform the device is supposed to be configured as a wakeup source. Thanks. -- Dmitry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
