On Thu, 15 Jun 2017 16:33:11 -0700 Eric Anholt <eric@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Eric Anholt <eric@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > [ Unknown signature status ] > > Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > >> On Tue, 06 Jun 2017 13:27:09 -0700 > >> Eric Anholt <eric@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >>> Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >>> > >>> > The VC4 KMS driver is implementing its own ->atomic_commit() but there > >>> > are a few generic helpers we can use instead of open-coding the logic. > >>> > > >>> > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>> > --- > >>> > drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_kms.c | 38 ++++++++++++-------------------------- > >>> > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) > >>> > > >>> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_kms.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_kms.c > >>> > index ad7925a9e0ea..f229abc0991b 100644 > >>> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_kms.c > >>> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_kms.c > >>> > @@ -42,6 +42,10 @@ vc4_atomic_complete_commit(struct vc4_commit *c) > >>> > struct drm_device *dev = state->dev; > >>> > struct vc4_dev *vc4 = to_vc4_dev(dev); > >>> > > >>> > + drm_atomic_helper_wait_for_fences(dev, state, false); > >>> > + > >>> > + drm_atomic_helper_wait_for_dependencies(state); > >>> > >>> With this wait_for_fences() addition and the reservation stuff that > >>> landed, I think we can rip out the "seqno cb" in vc4, and just use > >>> drm_atomic_helper_commit() and drm_atomic_hepler_commit_tail(). Do you > >>> see anything missing, with that? > >> > >> I can't tell. I haven't dig enough to understand what this seqno cb was > >> used for :-), but Daniel was suggesting the same thing. I'll try to > >> better understand what seqno cb does and if it's all safe to get rid of > >> it and use the standard helpers. > > > > The seqno cb was the thing for stalling the modeset until V3D was done > > rendering to the planes. The wait_for_fences() does the same thing > > using generic dmabuf reservations, so the seqno cb isn't needed any > > more. > > Oh, we've got another user of the seqno cb (async flips), anyway, so we > can't delete it quite yet. I've pushed this patch since it's a clear > improvement (less code, waits for fences from other devices if any). Ok. Did you fix the leak before applying? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html