Hi Rob,
Gentle ping.
On 04/12/2017 03:31 PM, Alexandre Torgue wrote:
Hi Rob,
On 04/10/2017 10:27 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 02:43:00PM +0200, Alexandre TORGUE wrote:
STM32F4 MCU series is composed of several SOC (STM32F429, STM32F469,
...).
Most of muxing definition are identical. So to avoid to duplicate
bindings
definition, this patch create common definitions.
This is a lot of churn. Some confirmation that the resultant dtb is the
same before and after would be nice. Perhaps the script you used to
convert this as well.
I tried to use fdtdump but it seems bugged. So I used directly dtc
binary to (re)generate dts files (before and after apply the series) and
I compared "pinmux" field in both case.
Example on stm32f469-disco:
./scripts/dtc/dtc -I dtb -O dts -o stm32f469-disco-after.dts
stm32f469-disco-after.dtb
./scripts/dtc/dtc -I dtb -O dts -o stm32f469-disco-before.dts
stm32f469-disco-before.dtb
cat stm32f469-disco-after.dts | grep pinmux
cat stm32f469-disco-before.dts | grep pinmux
Do you agree with verifications ?
regards
alex
Rob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
