On 2017-05-24 23:23, Shawn Guo wrote: > On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 05:04:58AM +0000, A.S. Dong wrote: >> If we really want to change, 'IMX7ULP1' may be a little strange as 'IMX7ULP' is >> the official external name and all other places are using it. >> So IMX7ULP may be more suitable. > > Yes, I actually meant IMX7ULP, which matches how we name the SoC > elsewhere in the kernel. > All the other arch/arm/boot/dts/imx*pinfunc.h use MX7ULP (without the I), but I am fine with either one. -- Stefan >> >> Then next generation may be: >> IMX7ULP0_PAD_PTC0_PTC0. >> Vs >> IMX7ULP_PAD_PTC0_PTC0 >> >> Just not much better than: >> ULP1_PAD_PTC0_PTC0. >> vs >> ULP0_PAD_PTC0_PTC0 >> >> That's why I did not do it initially. >> >> However, if you do want the change, i'm okay to do it. > > For the next generation, we will have a name for it in the kernel > anyway. The pinctrl macro simply follows that name. > > Shawn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
