On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 05:04:58AM +0000, A.S. Dong wrote: > If we really want to change, 'IMX7ULP1' may be a little strange as 'IMX7ULP' is > the official external name and all other places are using it. > So IMX7ULP may be more suitable. Yes, I actually meant IMX7ULP, which matches how we name the SoC elsewhere in the kernel. > > Then next generation may be: > IMX7ULP0_PAD_PTC0_PTC0. > Vs > IMX7ULP_PAD_PTC0_PTC0 > > Just not much better than: > ULP1_PAD_PTC0_PTC0. > vs > ULP0_PAD_PTC0_PTC0 > > That's why I did not do it initially. > > However, if you do want the change, i'm okay to do it. For the next generation, we will have a name for it in the kernel anyway. The pinctrl macro simply follows that name. Shawn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
