Hello Lee, On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 12:40 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hello, > > On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 1:50 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Thu, 04 May 2017, Wolfram Sang wrote: >>> thanks for the series. >>> >>> > Most patches can be applied independently, with the exception of patches >>> > 2 to 4 that should be applied in the same tree to keep bisect-ability. I >>> > suggest these to go through the MFD subsystem tree. >>> >>> From my POV, patches 2-5 should be applied to the same tree. Since all > > Yes, I didn't mention 5 because is just a documentation change. But it > would be better if is merged together with 2-4 indeed. > >>> I2C related patches have my tag, I assume they will be picked up by MFD. >>> Lee, let me know if you prefer differently. >> >> I can pick them up, no problem. Can the ARM patches be taking >> independently? I'm guessing they can since they are separate from one >> another. >> > > That's corect. The only platform changes that can't be picked > independently from MFD are the ones in patch 2, but tha's why I added > in the same patch. The OMAP folks (Tony and Aaro) already acked so you > can pick it. > Is there anything else I need to do for you to pick this series? Best regards, Javier -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
