Hello, On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 1:50 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 04 May 2017, Wolfram Sang wrote: >> thanks for the series. >> >> > Most patches can be applied independently, with the exception of patches >> > 2 to 4 that should be applied in the same tree to keep bisect-ability. I >> > suggest these to go through the MFD subsystem tree. >> >> From my POV, patches 2-5 should be applied to the same tree. Since all Yes, I didn't mention 5 because is just a documentation change. But it would be better if is merged together with 2-4 indeed. >> I2C related patches have my tag, I assume they will be picked up by MFD. >> Lee, let me know if you prefer differently. > > I can pick them up, no problem. Can the ARM patches be taking > independently? I'm guessing they can since they are separate from one > another. > That's corect. The only platform changes that can't be picked independently from MFD are the ones in patch 2, but tha's why I added in the same patch. The OMAP folks (Tony and Aaro) already acked so you can pick it. Best regards, Javier -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
