On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 12:51:24PM +0800, Jeremy Kerr wrote: > This change introduces a proposed layout for describing FSI busses in > the device tree. While the bus is probe-able, we'd still like a method > of describing subordinate (eg i2c) busses that are behind FSI devices. > > The FSI core will be responsible for matching probed slaves & engines to > their device tree nodes, so the FSI device drivers' probe() functions > will be passed a struct device with the appropriate of_node populated > where a matching DT node is found. Missed this the first time, "dt-bindings: fsi: " is the preferred subject prefix. No need to respin just for that. > > Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr <jk@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/fsi/fsi.txt | 144 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 144 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/fsi/fsi.txt Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
