On 05/16/2017 09:24 PM, Anup Patel wrote: > On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 12:23 AM, Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> >> >> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 4:30 AM, Anup Patel <anup.patel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> This patchset adds initial support of Broadcom Stingray SOC >>> by reusing existing Broadcom iProc device drivers. >>> >>> Most of the patches in this patchset are DT patches except >>> the Stingray clock tree support which just one patch. >>> >>> This patchset is based on Linux-4.12-rc1 and it is also available >>> at stingray-v3 branch of https://github.com/Broadcom/arm64-linux.git >>> >>> Changes since v2: >>> - Remove default bootargs from chosen DT node >>> - Remove "linux" prefix from stdout DT attribute of chosen DT node >>> - Remove use of GIC_CPU_MASK_xxx() for PPIs >>> >>> Changes since v1: >>> - Rebased patches for Linux-4.12-rc1 >>> - Removed unwanted /memreserve/ from bcm958742-base.dtsi >>> - Use ranges DT property to clear view of memory-layout >>> - Make bcm-sr.h part of clock DT bindings patch >>> >>> Anup Patel (3): >>> dt-bindings: bcm: Add Broadcom Stingray bindings document >>> arm64: dts: Initial DTS files for Broadcom Stingray SOC >>> arm64: dts: Add PL022, PL330 and SP805 DT nodes for Stingray >>> >>> Oza Pawandeep (1): >>> arm64: dts: Add I2C DT nodes for Stingray SoC >>> >>> Pramod Kumar (3): >>> arm64: dts: Add NAND DT nodes for Stingray SOC >>> arm64: dts: Add pinctrl DT nodes for Stingray SOC >>> arm64: dts: Add GPIO DT nodes for Stingray SOC >>> >>> Sandeep Tripathy (3): >>> dt-bindings: clk: Extend binding doc for Stingray SOC >>> clk: bcm: Add clocks for Stingray SOC >>> arm64: dts: Add clock DT nodes for Stingray SOC >>> >>> Srinath Mannam (1): >>> arm64: dts: Add PWM and SDHCI DT nodes for Stingray SOC >>> >>> .../devicetree/bindings/arm/bcm/brcm,stingray.txt | 12 + >>> .../bindings/clock/brcm,iproc-clocks.txt | 76 ++++ >>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/Makefile | 1 + >>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/stingray/Makefile | 6 + >>> .../boot/dts/broadcom/stingray/bcm958742-base.dtsi | 131 ++++++ >>> .../boot/dts/broadcom/stingray/bcm958742k.dts | 78 ++++ >>> .../boot/dts/broadcom/stingray/bcm958742t.dts | 40 ++ >>> .../boot/dts/broadcom/stingray/stingray-clock.dtsi | 170 ++++++++ >>> .../dts/broadcom/stingray/stingray-pinctrl.dtsi | 345 ++++++++++++++++ >>> .../arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/stingray/stingray.dtsi | 460 +++++++++++++++++++++ >>> drivers/clk/bcm/Kconfig | 8 + >>> drivers/clk/bcm/Makefile | 1 + >>> drivers/clk/bcm/clk-sr.c | 300 ++++++++++++++ >>> include/dt-bindings/clock/bcm-sr.h | 101 +++++ >>> .../dt-bindings/pinctrl/brcm,pinctrl-stingray.h | 68 +++ >>> 15 files changed, 1797 insertions(+) >>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/bcm/brcm,stingray.txt >>> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/stingray/Makefile >>> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/stingray/bcm958742-base.dtsi >>> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/stingray/bcm958742k.dts >>> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/stingray/bcm958742t.dts >>> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/stingray/stingray-clock.dtsi >>> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/stingray/stingray-pinctrl.dtsi >>> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/stingray/stingray.dtsi >>> create mode 100644 drivers/clk/bcm/clk-sr.c >>> create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/clock/bcm-sr.h >>> create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/brcm,pinctrl-stingray.h >> >> Grouping as one patchset for review is fine, but when you submit this >> for merge you need to split it up: >> >> - Documentation/devicetree can go with the driver pieces or with the >> DT changes, your choice >> - DTS/DTSI changes should go through the Broadcom maintainers to arm-soc >> - clk changes should go to clk maintainers. > > Only PATCH3 needs to go through clk maintainers rest all patches > are DT bindings document and DTS changes which can go through > Broadcom tree. Right ?? Patch 2 and 3 should go through the clock maintainers, and I can take the remaining patches through the Broadcom ARM/ARM64 SoC pull requests, no problem. Unless there are specific changes requested which warrant a v4, I can coordinate with Stephen and Mike to make sure that they take the appropriate patches. > >> >> Also, there's usually no need to split up a DT introduction and having >> separate pieces for NAND/pinctrl/GPIO/etc: They can all go in the main >> DT submission patch. > > Yes, we have already squashed DTS patches from same author into > one DTS patch except NAND, PINCTRL and GPIO patches. > > The NAND, PINCTRL, and GPIO patches were not squashed into > one patch for easy review but since you suggest I will squash these > three DTS patches into one DTS patch. > > Regards, > Anup > -- Florian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
