在 2017-05-19 15:19，Maxime Ripard 写道：
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 11:03:33AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
>The patch looks OK, but given the module is removable, I think it
>should be
>an overlay. The overlay would enable WiFi + Bluetooth, and all the
>peripherals needed to connect them.
>
>That way, if the module is not installed, we avoid confusing the user
>with
>unused peripherals, and avoid having live voltage on an unoccupied
>header.
But as this header have specific usage, we will also confuse user
if it's not enabled as its target usage.
Yet you would enable unused resources.
This was already pointed out here:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9670235/
I think, before we have an official repository of device tree
overlays (either directly in torvalds/linux or maintained by
linux-sunxi), we shouldn't rely on device tree overlay
functionality.
Maxime
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
