On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 06:47:58AM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote: > >> + "", "", "", "", "SCL", "SDA", "", "", > > > > I'm not sure how it's called in the schematics / documentation, but > > having a way to get which bus it's from would be helpful (like you did > > for the PMIC I2C bus). > > I use only names provided by schematics. Using something different IMO > makes no sense and confusing. Indeed. > >> + "", "", "", "", "", "", "", "", > >> + /* PC */ > >> + "", "", "", "", "", "", "", "", > >> + "", "", "", "", "", "", "", "", > >> + "", "", "", "", "", "", "", "", > >> + "", "", "", "", "", "", "", "", > >> + /* PD */ > >> + "", "", "", "", "", "", "", "", > >> + "", "", "", "", "", "", "", "", > >> + "", "", "", "", "", "", "", "", > >> + "", "", "", "", "", "", "", "", > >> + /* PE */ > >> + "", "", "", "", "", "", "", "", > >> + "", "", "", "", "", "", "", "", > >> + "", "", "", "", "", "", "", "", > >> + "", "", "", "", "", "", "", "", > >> + /* PF */ > >> + "SD0-D1", "SD0-D0", "SD0-CLK", "SD0-CMD", "SD0-D3", > >> + "SD0-D2", "", "", > > > > Why did you change the wrapping and indentation on those two lines? > > i use 8 entry per line to keep counting easier. If line is too wide, i > wrap it with changed indentation. Ack. > >> + "", "", "", "", "", "", "", "", > >> + "", "", "", "", "", "", "", "", > >> + "", "", "", "", "", "", "", "", > >> + /* PG */ > >> + "", "", "", "", "", "", "", "", > >> + "", "", "", "", "", "", "", "", > >> + "", "", "", "", "", "", "", "", > >> + "", "", "", "", "", "", "", "", > >> + /* PH */ > >> + "TXD0", "RXD0", "IO-1", "PH3", "USB0-IDDET", "PH5", "", "", > > > > What are PH3 and PH5 used for on the board? Can't we provide a more > > explicit name? > > Only names used by schematic :) If we will use something different users > will hate us even more. Those schematics suck then :) > I can image to use some kind of combination of connector name and pin > name. For example: "JP1-RXD0", or some thing like this. There's no mark on the PCB either? RXD0 and the other are fine, the only ones that concern me are PH3 and PH5, which are basically only the SoC pin name, and nothing else. I guess we don't really have the choice if the schematic uses that, and there's nothing on the PCB.. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
