On 08-05-17, 14:57, Sudeep Holla wrote: > Yes, I followed the thread and figured that out. But Rajendra also > raised "What if the microcontroller firmware maps the performance-index > to voltage but expects linux to scale the frequency? There is no way to > specify a performance-index *and* a frequency for a OPP now I guess? So > this needs to be addressd now IIUC. No, he misunderstood it. He was saying that the domain needs a performance-index and the device needs freq-scaling, how do we do that? He thought that there will be just one OPP table for the device here, but we will actually have two and that would work. > So as Kevin pointed out, we need to experiment and look at all > possibilities before finalizing the bindings. Better to have examples > for all these and describe how bindings are be used including how to > distinguish between these use-case from the bindings if it's not implicit. Yeah, I have some doubts on how we are going to implement that and looking for more input from him. -- viresh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html