Hi Mark and Laxman, thanks for your comments. El Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 09:30:01PM +0900 Mark Brown ha dit: > On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 01:32:09PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote: > > On Saturday 29 April 2017 05:36 AM, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote: > > > > -- regulator-settling-time-us: Settling time, in microseconds, for voltage > > > - change if regulator have the constant time for any level voltage change. > > > - This is useful when regulator have exponential voltage change. > > > +- regulator-settling-time-up-us: Settling time, in microseconds, for voltage > > > + increase if the regulator needs a constant time to settle after voltage > > > + increases of any level. This is useful for regulators with exponential > > > + voltage changes. > > > +- regulator-settling-time-down-us: Settling time, in microseconds, for voltage > > > + decrease if the regulator needs a constant time to settle after voltage > > > + decreases of any level. This is useful for regulators with exponential > > > + voltage changes. > > > Can we have regulator-settling-time-us also so if it is there then up/down > > same. > > If up/down different then separate properties can be used. > > Removing the existing binding would also break existing DTs using it > which we obviously don't want. I thought it might be ok in this case since the driver just landed. > I don't see any reason to even deprecate it, like Laxman says it's > nice and convenient for people with symmetric performance. Ok, I was 'concerned' about the redundancy, but if that is not seen as an issue I'm happy to just add the new properties. I'll send an updated patch soon. Thanks Matthias -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
