On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 01:32:09PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote: > On Saturday 29 April 2017 05:36 AM, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote: > > -- regulator-settling-time-us: Settling time, in microseconds, for voltage > > - change if regulator have the constant time for any level voltage change. > > - This is useful when regulator have exponential voltage change. > > +- regulator-settling-time-up-us: Settling time, in microseconds, for voltage > > + increase if the regulator needs a constant time to settle after voltage > > + increases of any level. This is useful for regulators with exponential > > + voltage changes. > > +- regulator-settling-time-down-us: Settling time, in microseconds, for voltage > > + decrease if the regulator needs a constant time to settle after voltage > > + decreases of any level. This is useful for regulators with exponential > > + voltage changes. > Can we have regulator-settling-time-us also so if it is there then up/down > same. > If up/down different then separate properties can be used. Removing the existing binding would also break existing DTs using it which we obviously don't want. I don't see any reason to even deprecate it, like Laxman says it's nice and convenient for people with symmetric performance.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
