Re: [RESEND PATCH v6 5/6] i2c: designware: add SLAVE mode functions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 03/17/17 13:24, Luis Oliveira wrote:
On 02-Mar-17 15:17, Luis Oliveira wrote:
On 02-Mar-17 14:33, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
On 03/01/17 17:59, Luis Oliveira wrote:
- Changes in Kconfig to enable I2C_DESIGNWARE_SLAVE support
- Slave functions added to core library file
- Slave abort sources added to common source file
- New driver: i2c-designware-slave added
- Changes in the Makefile to compile the I2C_DESIGNWARE_SLAVE module
  when supported by the architecture.

All the SLAVE flow is added but it is not enabled via platform
driver.

Signed-off-by: Luis Oliveira <lolivei@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
V5->V6
- Enable Slave mode using a different option (kbuild reported an error)
- Identation fixes needed
- Changed debug prints to dev_vdbg
- Fixed slave enumeration

 drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig                 |  14 +-
 drivers/i2c/busses/Makefile                |   1 +
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-common.c |   7 +
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-core.h   |   3 +
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-slave.c  | 403 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 5 files changed, 427 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-slave.c

...
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-common.c
b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-common.c
index 6357c7c78f6d..24641635aa20 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-common.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-common.c
@@ -56,6 +56,13 @@ static char *abort_sources[] = {
         "trying to use disabled adapter",
     [ARB_LOST] =
         "lost arbitration",
+    [ABRT_SLAVE_FLUSH_TXFIFO] =
+        "read command so flush old data in the TX FIFO",
+    [ABRT_SLAVE_ARBLOST] =
+        "slave lost the bus while transmitting data to a remote master",
+    [ABRT_SLAVE_RD_INTX] =
+        "slave request for data to be transmitted and there is a 1 in "
+        "bit 8 of IC_DATA_CMD",
 };

I know ABRT_SLAVE_RD_INTX case is from the specification but I would prefer here
one-line error text so it will be easier to grep from sources.

I would like it to be also be more understandable. I don't know did I understood
it correctly but does it occur when attempting to read controller while
transmitting or something like that?

It happens in the "slave-transmitter" mode, when the processor side responds to
a request for data to be transmitted and at the same time someone writes 1 to
the bit 8 of the IC_DATA_CMD. This bit in "slave-transmitter" mode has to be "0"
to indicate the data is to be transmitted.

In "slave-receiver" mode it has no purpose since writes to this register are not
required.

If you agree for the v7 I can change it to "incorrect slave-transmitter mode
configuration", it's not as clear but it gives a clue of where the error comes from.

I'm fine with it. I think it's more understandable.

--
Jarkko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux