On Tuesday, March 07, 2017 04:22:29 AM Dave Gerlach wrote: > Hi, > This is v4 of the series to add support for TI-SCI Generic PM Domains. > Previous versions can be found here: > > v3: https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2413975.html > v2: https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2364612.html > v1: http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg525204.html > > After much debate I have returned to using the phandle cell to pass the SCI ID > rather than the separate "ti,sci-id" property that was not very popular. In > order to do this I needed to make a change to the genpd framework which can be > seen in patch 2 and should benefit others that have client . Rather than > checking for zero phandle args and failing if any are present the > of_genpd_add_provider_simple call does not check at all and instead leaves > parsing and interpretation up to the platform genpd driver. > > This allows the ti_sci_pm_domains driver to parse the phandle and use the first > phandle cell as the sci-id rather than getting it from a separate property. > > Besides that none of the original patches have changed apart from updating the > year to 2017 in patches 3 and 4 and of course a small update to patch 4 to let > the ti_sci_pm_domains parse the phandle and extract the sci-id rather than > looking for the rejected ti,sci-id property. > > I did not update the "power-domain" binding document because in regards to > #power-domain-cells it already states "can be any value as specified by device > tree binding documentation of particular provider" which I think already > describes the change in patch 2. I'm assuming that this will go in through the arm-soc tree. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
