On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 10:14:49AM -0800, Steve Longerbeam wrote: > On 03/11/2017 03:39 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote: > >It's fine to use an internal event as long as the end-user doesn't > >see it. But if you lose vsyncs, then you never capture another frame, > >right? > > No, that's not correct. By loss of vertical sync, I mean the IPU > captures portions of two different frames, resulting in a permanent > "split image", with one frame containing portions of two consecutive > images. Or, the video rolls continuously, if you remember the old CRT > television sets of yore, it's the same rolling effect. I have seen that rolling effect, but the iMX6 regains correct sync within one complete "roll" just fine here with IMX219. However, it has always recovered. So, I don't think there's a problem with the iMX6 part of the processing, and so I don't think we should cripple the iMX6 capture drivers for this problem. It seems to me that the problem is with the source. -- RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
