On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 05:26:17PM +0100, Jerome Brunet wrote: > Hi Mark, Please don't top post, reply in line with needed context. This allows readers to readily follow the flow of conversation and understand what you are talking about and also helps ensure that everything in the discussion is being addressed. > In this series, you applied patch 2 and 3 but not patch 1. > (so the dioo prefix is used but not documented) > Is it on purpose ? > The patch does not have the "ASoC" prefix, this maybe why it was > missed. Since, the file does no belong to alsa, I wasn't sure whether > to put the prefix or not. This is a generic DT patch, not part of the bindings, so I'd expect the DT maintainers to take it.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
