On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 5:10 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 05:06:02PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: >> On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Priit Laes <plaes@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > SMARC-sAMX6i is a SMARC (Smart Mobility Architecture) compliant >> > module. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Priit Laes <plaes@xxxxxxxxx> >> > --- >> > arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-smarc-sam6xi.dtsi | 434 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> > 1 file changed, 434 insertions(+) >> > create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-smarc-sam6xi.dtsi >> > >> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-smarc-sam6xi.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-smarc-sam6xi.dtsi >> > new file mode 100644 >> > index 0000000..e3d7a35 >> > --- /dev/null >> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-smarc-sam6xi.dtsi >> > @@ -0,0 +1,434 @@ >> > +/* >> > + * Copyright 2017 Priit Laes <plaes@xxxxxxxxx> >> > + * >> > + * Based on initial work by Nikita Yushchenko <nyushchenko at dev.rtsoft.ru> >> > + * >> > + * This file is dual-licensed: you can use it either under the terms >> > + * of the GPL or the X11 license, at your option. Note that this dual >> > + * licensing only applies to this file, and not this project as a >> > + * whole. >> > + * >> > + * a) This file is free software; you can redistribute it and/or >> > + * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as >> > + * published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of >> > + * the License, or (at your option) any later version. >> > + * >> > + * This file is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, >> > + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of >> > + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the >> > + * GNU General Public License for more details. >> > + * >> > + * Or, alternatively, >> > + * >> > + * b) Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person >> > + * obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation >> > + * files (the "Software"), to deal in the Software without >> > + * restriction, including without limitation the rights to use, >> > + * copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or >> > + * sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the >> > + * Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following >> > + * conditions: >> > + * >> > + * The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be >> > + * included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software. >> > + * >> > + * THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, >> > + * EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES >> > + * OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND >> > + * NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT >> > + * HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, >> > + * WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING >> > + * FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR >> > + * OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE. >> >> Use SPDX tags here: >> >> SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT) >> >> While it says X11, this is really MIT license text. > > No. Read the FSF's page on licenses: > > X11 License (#X11License) > ... > This license is sometimes called the MIT license, but that term is > misleading, since MIT has used many licenses for software. > > Never use the term "MIT license", it's ambiguous, and I doubt that such > a term (given the above) would stand up in a court of law as identifying > any particular license. The SPDX tags have a very exact, documented meaning. That's the point. X11 means this[1]. MIT means this[2]. Rob [1] https://spdx.org/licenses/X11.html#licenseText [2] https://spdx.org/licenses/MIT.html#licenseText -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
