Le 19/12/2013 20:36, Mike Turquette a écrit :
Quoting boris brezillon (2013-12-19 00:54:07)
Hello Mike,
On 19/12/2013 07:04, Mike Turquette wrote:
Quoting Boris BREZILLON (2013-12-17 06:36:22)
+unsigned long __clk_get_accuracy(struct clk *clk)
+{
+ unsigned long ret;
+
+ if (!clk)
+ return 0;
+
+ return clk->accuracy;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__clk_get_accuracy);
Any reason for exporting this?
This might be used by clk drivers to choose the most accurate clk
among its parent clks (within the determinate_rate callback).
And as some clk drivers might be compiled as modules we need
to export the symbol (__clk_get_name helper function is exported
too).
Does your driver need this or is this just following the existing
__clk_get_rate / clk_get_rate model?
No, I don't need this for my driver, at least for the moment.
Do you want me to drop this EXPORT_SYMBOL ?
Regards,
Mike
Best Regards,
Boris
Regards,
Mike
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
