On 21.2.2017 15:24, Anatolij Gustschin wrote: > On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 15:01:32 +0100 > Michal Simek michal.simek@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > ... >>> +static struct spi_driver xilinx_slave_spi_driver = { >>> + .driver = { >>> + .name = "xlnx-slave-spi", >>> + .owner = THIS_MODULE, >> >> This should be done by core and it is checked by testing system. > > Okay, will remove it. > > ... >>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); >> >> Above you have GPL v2 and here v2 or later. >> >> include/linux/module.h >> * "GPL" [GNU Public License v2 or later] >> * "GPL v2" [GNU Public License v2] >> >> What's the license then? > > should be "GPL v2", I'll fix it next patch version. > > ... >>> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Load Xilinx FPGA firmware over SPI"); >>> >> >> What's the hw configuration? > > I used Spartan-6 for testing. But the driver might work with other > Xilinx FPGAs, so I didn't add exact hw description. ok. I expect this is spartan-6 next to another SoC and you use spi for that another SoC and you connect. I think it will be good to extend that example and add also spi device node to see where this should be placed. Thanks, Michal -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html