Hello, On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 14:16:13 +0100, Andreas Färber wrote: > I'm confused now. According to Marvell IR [0] they are NASDAQ-listed as > MRVL. My understanding is that in that case the official vendor prefix > becomes mrvl. Why not here? Not sure why, but as of today, we have a mix of "mrvl" and "marvell" in the tree, and "marvell" is the one official listed in vendor-prefixes.txt. > Any comments on the iap140 vs. pxa1908 naming? The Communication > Processors section has disappeared from marvell.com, so I couldn't > verify whether IAP140 was renamed from PXA1908 or whether both coexist > and we should add a second compatible string here? I don't have an opinion on this because I'm not familiar with this family of Marvell SoCs. However, the only thing I would recommend is that you send a patch to update Documentation/arm/Marvell/README to document this PXA1908/IAP140 thing. This is particularly important since this document mentions PXA1908 already. Thanks! Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
