Hi, Am 20.02.2017 um 13:56 schrieb Thomas Petazzoni: > On Sun, 19 Feb 2017 04:19:58 +0100, Andreas Färber wrote: > >> + - compatible : must contain "mrvl,iap140" > > Even though there's indeed a good number of existing "mrvl," compatible > strings in the tree, the official vendor prefix according to > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt is "marvell". > Probably you should use that instead for new bindings? I'm confused now. According to Marvell IR [0] they are NASDAQ-listed as MRVL. My understanding is that in that case the official vendor prefix becomes mrvl. Why not here? Would be good to understand for other pending vendors such as Actions Semi. Any comments on the iap140 vs. pxa1908 naming? The Communication Processors section has disappeared from marvell.com, so I couldn't verify whether IAP140 was renamed from PXA1908 or whether both coexist and we should add a second compatible string here? Thanks, Andreas [0] http://investor.marvell.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=120802&p=irol-irhome -- SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
