On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 1:47 AM, Boris Brezillon
<boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Feb 2017 13:05:57 -0600
> Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Similar to the previous commit, convert drivers open coding OF graph
>> parsing to use drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge instead.
>>
>> This changes some error messages to debug messages (in the graph core).
>> Graph connections are often "no connects" depending on the particular
>> board, so we want to avoid spurious messages. Plus the kernel is not a
>> DT validator.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> v2:
>> - fix wrong node ptr in imx-ldb
>> - build fixes in kirin and imx drivers
>>
>> drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_output.c | 64 ++++-------------
>> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/nxp-ptn3460.c | 16 ++---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/parade-ps8622.c | 16 ++---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/tc358767.c | 27 +------
>> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp.c | 35 ++++-----
>> drivers/gpu/drm/fsl-dcu/fsl_dcu_drm_rgb.c | 49 ++++---------
>> drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/kirin/dw_drm_dsi.c | 27 ++-----
>> drivers/gpu/drm/imx/imx-ldb.c | 27 ++-----
>> drivers/gpu/drm/imx/parallel-display.c | 36 ++--------
>> drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c | 23 ++----
>> drivers/gpu/drm/mxsfb/mxsfb_out.c | 36 ++--------
>> drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/analogix_dp-rockchip.c | 26 ++-----
>> drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_rgb.c | 13 ++--
>> drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.c | 90 ++----------------------
>> 14 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 397 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_output.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_output.c
>> index 6119b5085501..4614048a4935 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_output.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_output.c
>> @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
>> #include <linux/of_graph.h>
>>
>> #include <drm/drmP.h>
>> -#include <drm/drm_panel.h>
>> +#include <drm/drm_of.h>
>>
>> #include "atmel_hlcdc_dc.h"
>>
>> @@ -152,29 +152,11 @@ static const struct drm_connector_funcs atmel_hlcdc_panel_connector_funcs = {
>> .atomic_destroy_state = drm_atomic_helper_connector_destroy_state,
>> };
>>
>> -static int atmel_hlcdc_check_endpoint(struct drm_device *dev,
>> - const struct of_endpoint *ep)
>> -{
>> - struct device_node *np;
>> - void *obj;
>> -
>> - np = of_graph_get_remote_port_parent(ep->local_node);
>> -
>> - obj = of_drm_find_panel(np);
>> - if (!obj)
>> - obj = of_drm_find_bridge(np);
>> -
>> - of_node_put(np);
>> -
>> - return obj ? 0 : -EPROBE_DEFER;
>> -}
>> -
>> static int atmel_hlcdc_attach_endpoint(struct drm_device *dev,
>> - const struct of_endpoint *ep)
>> + const struct device_node *np)
>> {
>> struct atmel_hlcdc_dc *dc = dev->dev_private;
>> struct atmel_hlcdc_rgb_output *output;
>> - struct device_node *np;
>> struct drm_panel *panel;
>> struct drm_bridge *bridge;
>> int ret;
>> @@ -195,13 +177,11 @@ static int atmel_hlcdc_attach_endpoint(struct drm_device *dev,
>>
>> output->encoder.possible_crtcs = 0x1;
>>
>> - np = of_graph_get_remote_port_parent(ep->local_node);
>> -
>> - ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
>> + ret = drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge(np, 0, 0, &panel, &bridge);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>>
>> - panel = of_drm_find_panel(np);
>> if (panel) {
>> - of_node_put(np);
>> output->connector.dpms = DRM_MODE_DPMS_OFF;
>> output->connector.polled = DRM_CONNECTOR_POLL_CONNECT;
>> drm_connector_helper_add(&output->connector,
>> @@ -226,9 +206,6 @@ static int atmel_hlcdc_attach_endpoint(struct drm_device *dev,
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> - bridge = of_drm_find_bridge(np);
>> - of_node_put(np);
>> -
>> if (bridge) {
>> output->encoder.bridge = bridge;
>> bridge->encoder = &output->encoder;
>> @@ -245,31 +222,14 @@ static int atmel_hlcdc_attach_endpoint(struct drm_device *dev,
>>
>> int atmel_hlcdc_create_outputs(struct drm_device *dev)
>> {
>> - struct device_node *ep_np = NULL;
>> - struct of_endpoint ep;
>> + struct device_node *remote;
>> int ret;
>>
>> - for_each_endpoint_of_node(dev->dev->of_node, ep_np) {
>> - ret = of_graph_parse_endpoint(ep_np, &ep);
>> - if (!ret)
>> - ret = atmel_hlcdc_check_endpoint(dev, &ep);
>> -
>> - if (ret) {
>> - of_node_put(ep_np);
>> - return ret;
>> - }
>> - }
>> -
>> - for_each_endpoint_of_node(dev->dev->of_node, ep_np) {
>> - ret = of_graph_parse_endpoint(ep_np, &ep);
>> - if (!ret)
>> - ret = atmel_hlcdc_attach_endpoint(dev, &ep);
>> -
>> - if (ret) {
>> - of_node_put(ep_np);
>> - return ret;
>> - }
>> - }
>> + remote = of_graph_get_remote_node(dev->dev->of_node, 0, 0);
>> + if (!remote)
>> + return -ENODEV;
>
> I know you said ports and endpoints should be statically assigned and
> documented in the DT bindings doc, while I agree with the ports part,
> having static endpoints numbering is not possible in some cases.
Okay, I guess it's more that ports are defined. For cases, where you
have a 1 to N connection like this, then yes it's okay.
> Here the port exposed by the Atmel display controller is a raw RGB (or
> parallel RGB) port, and you can connect as many devices as you want to
> this port. For example, on some atmel boards with have 1 bridge ans 1
> panel connected to the same port (but we could have X bridges and Y
> panels and it would work the same way), hence the
> for_each_endpoint_of_node() loop used to connect panels and bridges to
> the controller.
> With your change, my use case no longer works, I can either have the
> panel or the bridge, but not both.
>
> Something like the following would solve the problem:
>
> endpoint = 0;
> while (true) {
> remote = of_graph_get_remote_node(dev->dev->of_node, 0,
> endpoint++);
> if (!remote)
> break;
>
> ret = atmel_hlcdc_attach_endpoint(dev, remote);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> }
>
> if (!endpoint)
> return -ENODEV;
>
> return 0;
>
> If you're not happy with the 'random number of endpoints' thing, can
> you suggest another approach to handle the raw RGB port case (I'm
> pretty sure I'm not the only one to have this use case).
This seems fine to me. The question I have is whether to handle this
loop in the core and whether to have a loop iterator. There's a few
cases of iterating thru all the ports getting remote nodes that I was
thinking about how to handle too.
Rob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
