On 12/18/2013 05:47 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
Hi Daniel,
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 03:53:51PM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 12/17/2013 08:21 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
Hi Daniel,
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 05:04:50PM -0800, Soren Brinkmann wrote:
It is not allowed to call clk_get_rate() from interrupt context. To
avoid such calls the timer input frequency is stored in the driver's
data struct which makes it accessible to the driver in any context.
Signed-off-by: Soren Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
I doubt that we'll resolve all issues with this series before the
holidays or even the next merge window. Could you take this patch into
your tree for 3.14? It is not directly related to the cpufreq work and
fixes an actual issue that triggers a kernel WARN under some condition
(I missed preserving the details and the trace). That would take the
easy stuff out of the way and we can focus on the more controversial
changes.
You are asking to take it for 3.14 but shouldn't it go as a 3.13 fix ?
That's also an option. As I remember, the patch fixes a kernel WARN. The
system still seemed operational though. Up to you whether this is
considered severe enough for the 3.13 series. I'm happy either way.
I was not able to reproduce the WARN with my board.
Please, could you give the WARN or give the procedure to reproduce it ?
Thanks
-- Daniel
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
