On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 3:32 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Linus Walleij > <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 9:33 AM, Marek Szyprowski >> <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> Patches in this patchset depends on each other. They are order in such a >>> way to make the changes bisectable. >>> >>> Patch #3 has runtime dependency on #1. >>> Patch #5 has runtime dependency on #3. >>> Patch #6 has runtime dependency on #4. >>> >>> This patchset also directly depends on the "Move pad retention control to >>> Exynos pin controller driver" patchset: >>> https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg556074.html >> >> Do we *have* to merge it runtime-bisectably? >> >> I'm asking because we need a huge immutable branch >> (I guess in the MFD subsystem) to deal with that. > > It helps a lot with finding introduced issues, so I think yes - we > want it runtime-bisectable. The board has already support in mainline > so it is not theoretical runtime... OK I just wait for an immutable branch to pull for this to work out then. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
