On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 9:33 AM, Marek Szyprowski > <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Patches in this patchset depends on each other. They are order in such a >> way to make the changes bisectable. >> >> Patch #3 has runtime dependency on #1. >> Patch #5 has runtime dependency on #3. >> Patch #6 has runtime dependency on #4. >> >> This patchset also directly depends on the "Move pad retention control to >> Exynos pin controller driver" patchset: >> https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg556074.html > > Do we *have* to merge it runtime-bisectably? > > I'm asking because we need a huge immutable branch > (I guess in the MFD subsystem) to deal with that. It helps a lot with finding introduced issues, so I think yes - we want it runtime-bisectable. The board has already support in mainline so it is not theoretical runtime... Best regards, Krzysztof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
