Hello,
On Wed, 18 Jan 2017 01:10:00 +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> > Add a new compatible for sun4i-i2s driver to handle some
> > SoCs that have a reset line that must be asserted/deasserted.
> >
> > This new compatible, "allwinner,sun6i-a31-i2s", requires two
> > properties:
> > - resets: phandle to the reset line
> > - reset-names: the name of the reset line ("rst").
> > Except these differences, the compatible is identical to previous one
> > which will not handle a reset line.
>
> But I think the IP block is identical, right?
>
> Should a new compatible be added only for reset-line?
Having a different compatible in this case allows to make some stricter
error checking: the driver can make sure that if the compatible string
is sun6i-a31-i2s there *IS* a reset line specified in the DT. Without a
separate compatible value, such a check is not possible, and the reset
line is just optional. This can lead to people being confused if they
forget to specify the reset line.
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
