On 12/16/2013 09:29 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 3:12 AM, Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@xxxxxx> wrote:The similar GPIO HW block is used by keystone SoCs as in Davinci SoCs. Hence, reuse Davinci GPIO driver for Keystone taking into account that Keystone contains ARM GIC IRQ controller which is implemented using IRQ Chip. Documentation: http://www.ti.com/lit/ug/sprugv1/sprugv1.pdf CC: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> CC: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@xxxxxx> CC: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@xxxxxx> CC: devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@xxxxxx> --- .../devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-davinci.txt | 4 +- drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c | 49 +++++++++++++++----- 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-davinci.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-davinci.txt index a2e839d..4ce9862 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-davinci.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-davinci.txt @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ -Davinci GPIO controller bindings +Davinci/Keystone GPIO controller bindings Required Properties: -- compatible: should be "ti,dm6441-gpio" +- compatible: should be "ti,dm6441-gpio", "ti,keystone-gpio" - reg: Physical base address of the controller and the size of memory mapped registers. diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c index 73f65ca..3e44e0c 100644 --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c @@ -413,6 +413,27 @@ static const struct irq_domain_ops davinci_gpio_irq_ops = { .xlate = irq_domain_xlate_onetwocell, }; +static struct irq_chip *davinci_gpio_get_irq_chip(unsigned int irq) +{ + static struct irq_chip_type gpio_unbanked; + + gpio_unbanked = *container_of(irq_get_chip(irq), + struct irq_chip_type, chip); + + return &gpio_unbanked.chip; +}; + +static struct irq_chip *keystone_gpio_get_irq_chip(unsigned int irq) +{ + static struct irq_chip gpio_unbanked; + + gpio_unbanked = *irq_get_chip(irq); + pr_err("keystone_gpio_get_irq_chip\n");Do you intend this pr_err() to remain here?
No, thanks - will remove.
+ return &gpio_unbanked; +}; + +static const struct of_device_id davinci_gpio_ids[]; + /* * NOTE: for suspend/resume, probably best to make a platform_device with * suspend_late/resume_resume calls hooking into results of the set_wake() @@ -433,6 +454,15 @@ static int davinci_gpio_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev) struct davinci_gpio_platform_data *pdata = dev->platform_data; struct davinci_gpio_regs __iomem *g; struct irq_domain *irq_domain = NULL; + const struct of_device_id *match; + struct irq_chip *irq_chip; + struct irq_chip *(*gpio_get_irq_chip)(unsigned int irq); + + gpio_get_irq_chip = davinci_gpio_get_irq_chip; + match = of_match_device(of_match_ptr(davinci_gpio_ids), + dev); + if (match) + gpio_get_irq_chip = match->data; ngpio = pdata->ngpio; res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, 0); @@ -442,7 +472,6 @@ static int davinci_gpio_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev) } bank_irq = res->start; - if (!bank_irq) { dev_err(dev, "Invalid IRQ resource\n"); return -ENODEV; @@ -484,25 +513,22 @@ static int davinci_gpio_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev) } /* - * AINTC can handle direct/unbanked IRQs for GPIOs, with the GPIO + * INTC can handle direct/unbanked IRQs for GPIOs, with the GPIO * controller only handling trigger modes. We currently assume no * IRQ mux conflicts; gpio_irq_type_unbanked() is only for GPIOs. */ if (pdata->gpio_unbanked) { - static struct irq_chip_type gpio_unbanked; - /* pass "bank 0" GPIO IRQs to AINTC */ chips[0].chip.to_irq = gpio_to_irq_unbanked; chips[0].gpio_irq = bank_irq; chips[0].gpio_unbanked = pdata->gpio_unbanked; binten = BIT(0); - /* AINTC handles mask/unmask; GPIO handles triggering */ + /* INTC handles mask/unmask; GPIO handles triggering */ irq = bank_irq; - gpio_unbanked = *container_of(irq_get_chip(irq), - struct irq_chip_type, chip); - gpio_unbanked.chip.name = "GPIO-AINTC"; - gpio_unbanked.chip.irq_set_type = gpio_irq_type_unbanked; + irq_chip = gpio_get_irq_chip(irq); + irq_chip->name = "GPIO-AINTC";According to the other renamings I see in this file, shouldn't the string also be changed to "GPIO-INTC"?
Right. Will change, it should be more generic now. I'll wait a bit for other comments and resend. Regards, -grygorii -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
