On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 3:12 AM, Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@xxxxxx> wrote: > The similar GPIO HW block is used by keystone SoCs as > in Davinci SoCs. > Hence, reuse Davinci GPIO driver for Keystone taking into > account that Keystone contains ARM GIC IRQ controller which > is implemented using IRQ Chip. > > Documentation: > http://www.ti.com/lit/ug/sprugv1/sprugv1.pdf > > CC: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> > CC: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@xxxxxx> > CC: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@xxxxxx> > CC: devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@xxxxxx> > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-davinci.txt | 4 +- > drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c | 49 +++++++++++++++----- > 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-davinci.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-davinci.txt > index a2e839d..4ce9862 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-davinci.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-davinci.txt > @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ > -Davinci GPIO controller bindings > +Davinci/Keystone GPIO controller bindings > > Required Properties: > -- compatible: should be "ti,dm6441-gpio" > +- compatible: should be "ti,dm6441-gpio", "ti,keystone-gpio" > > - reg: Physical base address of the controller and the size of memory mapped > registers. > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c > index 73f65ca..3e44e0c 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c > @@ -413,6 +413,27 @@ static const struct irq_domain_ops davinci_gpio_irq_ops = { > .xlate = irq_domain_xlate_onetwocell, > }; > > +static struct irq_chip *davinci_gpio_get_irq_chip(unsigned int irq) > +{ > + static struct irq_chip_type gpio_unbanked; > + > + gpio_unbanked = *container_of(irq_get_chip(irq), > + struct irq_chip_type, chip); > + > + return &gpio_unbanked.chip; > +}; > + > +static struct irq_chip *keystone_gpio_get_irq_chip(unsigned int irq) > +{ > + static struct irq_chip gpio_unbanked; > + > + gpio_unbanked = *irq_get_chip(irq); > + pr_err("keystone_gpio_get_irq_chip\n"); Do you intend this pr_err() to remain here? > + return &gpio_unbanked; > +}; > + > +static const struct of_device_id davinci_gpio_ids[]; > + > /* > * NOTE: for suspend/resume, probably best to make a platform_device with > * suspend_late/resume_resume calls hooking into results of the set_wake() > @@ -433,6 +454,15 @@ static int davinci_gpio_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev) > struct davinci_gpio_platform_data *pdata = dev->platform_data; > struct davinci_gpio_regs __iomem *g; > struct irq_domain *irq_domain = NULL; > + const struct of_device_id *match; > + struct irq_chip *irq_chip; > + struct irq_chip *(*gpio_get_irq_chip)(unsigned int irq); > + > + gpio_get_irq_chip = davinci_gpio_get_irq_chip; > + match = of_match_device(of_match_ptr(davinci_gpio_ids), > + dev); > + if (match) > + gpio_get_irq_chip = match->data; > > ngpio = pdata->ngpio; > res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, 0); > @@ -442,7 +472,6 @@ static int davinci_gpio_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev) > } > > bank_irq = res->start; > - > if (!bank_irq) { > dev_err(dev, "Invalid IRQ resource\n"); > return -ENODEV; > @@ -484,25 +513,22 @@ static int davinci_gpio_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev) > } > > /* > - * AINTC can handle direct/unbanked IRQs for GPIOs, with the GPIO > + * INTC can handle direct/unbanked IRQs for GPIOs, with the GPIO > * controller only handling trigger modes. We currently assume no > * IRQ mux conflicts; gpio_irq_type_unbanked() is only for GPIOs. > */ > if (pdata->gpio_unbanked) { > - static struct irq_chip_type gpio_unbanked; > - > /* pass "bank 0" GPIO IRQs to AINTC */ > chips[0].chip.to_irq = gpio_to_irq_unbanked; > chips[0].gpio_irq = bank_irq; > chips[0].gpio_unbanked = pdata->gpio_unbanked; > binten = BIT(0); > > - /* AINTC handles mask/unmask; GPIO handles triggering */ > + /* INTC handles mask/unmask; GPIO handles triggering */ > irq = bank_irq; > - gpio_unbanked = *container_of(irq_get_chip(irq), > - struct irq_chip_type, chip); > - gpio_unbanked.chip.name = "GPIO-AINTC"; > - gpio_unbanked.chip.irq_set_type = gpio_irq_type_unbanked; > + irq_chip = gpio_get_irq_chip(irq); > + irq_chip->name = "GPIO-AINTC"; According to the other renamings I see in this file, shouldn't the string also be changed to "GPIO-INTC"? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
