On 3 October 2016 at 15:29, Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> writes: > >> On Friday 30 September 2016, Felix Fietkau wrote: >>> >> >> >> + device_type = "pci"; >>> >> >> >> + mediatek,mtd-eeprom = <&factory 0x8000>; >>> >> >> >> + mediatek,2ghz = <0>; >>> >> > >>> >> > It's not clear what the possible values for the 2ghz property are, >>> >> > can you be more verbose in the description? How is <0> different >>> >> > from no property? >>> >> 0 means disabled, no property means unchanged (compared to EEPROM). >>> > >>> > Maybe have a boolean property instead then to say "mediatek,2ghz-disabled" ? >>> > >>> > If zero is the only possible value, there is no need to put a number in there. >>> 1 is also possible, which will force-enable the capability. >> >> Ok, then both those values should be documented in the binding. > > Related to this, Martin sent patches which add generic bindings for > enabling 2 Ghz and 5 Ghz bands. > > [RFC,1/3] Documentation: dt-bindings: add IEEE 802.11 binding documentation > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9359833/ > > [RFC,2/3] of: add IEEE 802.11 device configuration support code > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9359837/ I would prefer something more generic. Many tri-band routers split 5 GHz band into 2 sets of channels and they have separated radios for them. E.g. Netgear R8000 has phy0 which should be used for higher part of 5 GHz band (channels 149+) and phy2 which should be used for lower part of 5 GHz band (channels from 36 to 48 or 64). What do you think about some more flexible properties like: ieee80211-min-center-freq ieee80211-max-center-freq -- Rafał -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
