Re: [PATCH 3/3] clk: keystone: Add sci-clk driver support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 12/12/16 21:38, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 12/09, Tero Kristo wrote:
On 08/12/16 23:10, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 12/08, Tero Kristo wrote:
On 08/12/16 02:13, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 10/21, Tero Kristo wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/clk/keystone/sci-clk.c b/drivers/clk/keystone/sci-clk.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f6af5bd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/clk/keystone/sci-clk.c


+
+	handle = devm_ti_sci_get_handle(dev);
+	if (IS_ERR(handle))
+		return PTR_ERR(handle);
+
+	provider = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*provider), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!provider)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	provider->clocks = data;
+
+	provider->sci = handle;
+	provider->ops = &handle->ops.clk_ops;
+	provider->dev = dev;
+
+	ti_sci_init_clocks(provider);

And if this fails?

Yea this is kind of controversial. ti_sci_init_clocks() can fail if
any of the clocks registered will fail. I decided to have it this
way so that at least some clocks might work in failure cause, and
you might have a booting device instead of total lock-up.

Obviously it could be done so that if any clock fails, we would
de-register all clocks at that point, but personally I think this is
a worse option.

ti_sci_init_clocks could probably be modified to continue
registering clocks when a single clock fails though. Currently it
aborts at first failure.


That sounds like a better approach if we don't care about
failures to register a clock. Returning a value from a function
and not using it isn't really a great design.

I worry that if we start returning errors from clk_hw_register()
that something will go wrong though, so really I don't know why
we want to ignore errors at all. Just for debugging a boot hang?
Can't we use early console to at least see that this driver is
failing to probe and debug that way?

Early console can be used to debug that, but it is kind of annoying
to recompile most of the kernel when you suddenly need to use it.

I thought SERIAL_EARLYCON was selected by drivers that support
it? So there shouldn't be any rebuilding required.

Actually you can probably ignore my comment, I was just speaking out of OMAP experience where the clocks are initialized very early, but this doesn't apply to keystone. Sci-clock is a proper driver now with proper probe etc. in place so my comment here is invalid.



How about modifying the ti_sci_init_clocks func to print an error
for each failed clock?

Ok that's fine too. I'd prefer the function had a return type of
void if we're not planning on using the return value, that's all.

Ok, I'll see which way I go in v2 of the series, but seems I can pick either your original proposal or mine.

-Tero

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux