On Fri, 2016-12-09 at 16:49 -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 01:53:17PM +1100, Andrew Jeffery wrote: > > Whilst describing a device and not a bus, simple-mfd is modelled on > > simple-bus where child nodes are iterated and registered as platform > > devices. Some complex devices, e.g. the Aspeed LPC controller, can > > benefit from address space mapping such that child nodes can use the > > regs property to describe their resources within the multi-function > > device. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@xxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/mfd.txt | 10 ++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) > > No objections to this, but this is all implied by having a reg property. Thanks for clarifying. I wasn't sure so I wrote the patch with the thought that we could drop it if it wasn't necessary. Regardless, I think being explicit about the properties is nice. > > Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> Thanks, Andrew > > Rob
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
