Re: [PATCH v10 3/4] dtc: Plugin and fixup support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 10:50:53AM +0000, Phil Elwell wrote:
> On 29/11/2016 10:39, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> > Hi Phil,
> >
> >> On Nov 29, 2016, at 12:32 , Phil Elwell <phil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 29/11/2016 02:11, David Gibson wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:24:20PM +0000, Phil Elwell wrote:
> >>>> On 28/11/2016 12:10, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> >>>>> For plugins we need the __symbols__ node to support stacked overlays, i.e.
> >>>>> overlays referring label that were introduced by a previous overlay.
> >>>> Although it is arguably useful to be able to refer to symbols created by
> >>>> one overlay from within another, do we really want all symbols to be
> >>>> global? Isn't there a call for a new syntax or usage pattern to indicate
> >>>> either that a symbol should be local to the overlay or, my preferred
> >>>> option, global?
> >>> So, this is back to a design question about the overlay format.  As
> >>> noted in the initial discussions about possible "connector" formats, I
> >>> think we will want some sort of local symbols.  But the current
> >>> overlay format with all global symbols is out there and we need to
> >>> support it.
> >> The overlay format we have does not dictate the scope of the symbols.
> >>
> >> In all implementations I know of - the Raspberry Pi loader, the current
> >> Linux kernel, the latest dtc patch set - there is a completely
> >> asymmetric relationship between the base DTB and an overlay:
> >> * the base DTB exports __symbols__ to resolve the overlays unresolved
> >> label references, as recorded by the __fixups__ node
> >> * the overlay's phandles are renumbered so as not to clash with the base
> >> tree using the __local_fixups__
> >> * the contents of the __overlay__ nodes are applied to the base tree, as
> >> directed by the "target" or "target-path” properties
> >>
> > Yes
> >
> >> The __symbols__ node of the overlay is ignored and discarded. The
> >> __fixups__ and __local_fixups__ in the base DTB (if present - the RPi
> >> dtc only generates them for /plugins/) are ignored.
> >>
> > That was a limitation that no-longer applies. Overlay symbols can be added
> > to the base tree symbol list with a small patch I have already posted.
> The fact that they can doesn't mean they necessarily should.

They should - at least as long as we're using this simple overlay
format.  What else would you do with them?  If they're not merged,
they're useless in the overlay.

> >
> >> In the set of RPi overlays only one exports a global symbol, which it
> >> achieves with an overlay aimed at target-path = "/__symbols__" that adds
> >> a new symbol (in this case "i2c_gpio").
> >>
> >> If the __symbols__ in an overlay are automatically merged with the base
> >> symbols, that is a significant change in semantics which needs to be
> >> discussed.
> >>
> > You no longer need to do this anymore. Hope this helps :)
> 
> Not really, no. With the current scheme we have control over the scope,
> but now there is none.

You really don't, symbols were always global.

> 
> How does your patch handle duplicate symbols?
> 
> Phil

-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux