On Monday 09 December 2013, boris brezillon wrote: > > You are adding "clock-names" properties in a lot of cases. Are you sure you > > are using the strings that are documented in the respective device bindings > > for each name? In a lot of cases, drivers just want an anonymous clock > > and we don't name them. > > I rechecked it, and almost all drivers call [devm_]clk_get with a > specific clock > name, and as a result we must specify the "clock-names" property. > The only exceptions I found are the spi and PIT (Periodic Interval > Timer) drivers, > and "clock-names" property is not defined in these nodes. Yes, I understood that the *drivers* use the names, but are they actually documented in the device bindings? If not, it might be better to change the drivers. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
