palmas_dev and palmas_power_off are always assigned together. So the check for palmas_dev inside palmas_power_off function is redundant. Removing the same. Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@xxxxxx> --- drivers/mfd/palmas.c | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mfd/palmas.c b/drivers/mfd/palmas.c index 8f8bacb..ee9e9ea 100644 --- a/drivers/mfd/palmas.c +++ b/drivers/mfd/palmas.c @@ -431,9 +431,6 @@ static void palmas_power_off(void) unsigned int addr; int ret, slave; - if (!palmas_dev) - return; - slave = PALMAS_BASE_TO_SLAVE(PALMAS_PMU_CONTROL_BASE); addr = PALMAS_BASE_TO_REG(PALMAS_PMU_CONTROL_BASE, PALMAS_DEV_CTRL); -- 1.9.1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
