Hi,
John Youn <johnyoun@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Add a vendor prefix and make the name more consistent by renaming it to
> "snps,gadget-dma-enable".
>
> Signed-off-by: John Youn <johnyoun@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/dwc2.txt | 5 ++++-
> arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3036.dtsi | 2 +-
> arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi | 2 +-
> arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3xxx.dtsi | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hi6220.dtsi | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3368.dtsi | 2 +-
> drivers/usb/dwc2/params.c | 9 ++++++++-
> drivers/usb/dwc2/pci.c | 2 +-
> 8 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/dwc2.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/dwc2.txt
> index 9472111..389a461 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/dwc2.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/dwc2.txt
> @@ -26,11 +26,14 @@ Refer to phy/phy-bindings.txt for generic phy consumer properties
> - dr_mode: shall be one of "host", "peripheral" and "otg"
> Refer to usb/generic.txt
> - snps,host-dma-disable: disable host DMA mode.
> -- g-use-dma: enable dma usage in gadget driver.
> +- snps,gadget-dma-enable: enable gadget DMA mode.
I don't see why you even have this binding. Looking through the code,
you have:
#define GHWCFG2_SLAVE_ONLY_ARCH 0
#define GHWCFG2_EXT_DMA_ARCH 1
#define GHWCFG2_INT_DMA_ARCH 2
void dwc2_set_param_dma_enable(struct dwc2_hsotg *hsotg, int val)
{
int valid = 1;
if (val > 0 && hsotg->hw_params.arch == GHWCFG2_SLAVE_ONLY_ARCH)
valid = 0;
if (val < 0)
valid = 0;
if (!valid) {
if (val >= 0)
dev_err(hsotg->dev,
"%d invalid for dma_enable parameter. Check HW configuration.\n",
val);
val = hsotg->hw_params.arch != GHWCFG2_SLAVE_ONLY_ARCH;
dev_dbg(hsotg->dev, "Setting dma_enable to %d\n", val);
}
hsotg->core_params->dma_enable = val;
}
which seems to hint that DMA support is discoverable. If there is DMA,
why would disable it?
--
balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
