Re: [PATCH 3/6] clk: stm32f4: Add post divisor for I2S & SAI PLLs and Add lcd-tft clock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 07/11/16 13:05, gabriel.fernandez@xxxxxx wrote:
From: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@xxxxxx>

This patch adds post dividers of I2S & SAI PLLs.
These dividers are managed by a dedicated register (RCC_DCKCFGR).
The PLL should be off before a set rate.
This patch also introduces the lcd-tft clock.

Signed-off-by: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@xxxxxx>
---
 drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c b/drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c
index dda15bc..5fa5d51 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c
@@ -215,6 +215,7 @@ struct stm32f4_gate_data {
 enum {
 	SYSTICK, FCLK, CLK_LSI, CLK_LSE, CLK_HSE_RTC, CLK_RTC,
 	PLL_VCO_I2S, PLL_VCO_SAI,
+	CLK_LCD,
 	END_PRIMARY_CLK
 };

@@ -599,6 +600,9 @@ static struct clk_hw *clk_register_pll_div(const char *name,
 static const struct clk_div_table pll_divp_table[] = {
 	{ 0, 2 }, { 1, 4 }, { 2, 6 }, { 3, 8 },
 };
+static const struct clk_div_table pll_lcd_div_table[] = {
+	{ 0, 2 }, { 1, 4 }, { 2, 8 }, { 3, 16 },
+};

 /*
  * Decode current PLL state and (statically) model the state we inherit from
@@ -659,16 +663,35 @@ static struct clk_hw *stm32f4_rcc_register_pll(const char *pllsrc,
 		clk_register_pll_div(data->p_name, data->vco_name, 0, reg,
 				16, 2, 0, pll_divp_table, pll_hw, lock);

-	if (data->q_name)
+	if (data->q_name) {
 		clk_register_pll_div(data->q_name, data->vco_name, 0, reg,
 				24, 4, CLK_DIVIDER_ONE_BASED, NULL,
 				pll_hw, lock);

-	if (data->r_name)
+		if (data->pll_num == PLL_I2S)
+			clk_register_pll_div("plli2s-q-div", data->q_name,
+				0, base + STM32F4_RCC_DCKCFGR,
+				0, 5, 0, NULL, pll_hw, &stm32f4_clk_lock);
+
+		if (data->pll_num == PLL_SAI)
+			clk_register_pll_div("pllsai-q-div", data->q_name,
+				0, base + STM32F4_RCC_DCKCFGR,
+				8, 5, 0, NULL, pll_hw, &stm32f4_clk_lock);
+	}

Shouldn't this be in the config structures?

It seems very odd to me to allow the config structures to control whether we take the branch or not and then add these hard coded hacks.


Daniel.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux