Hi Catalin, On 30/10/16 14:22, Catalin Marinas wrote: > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 04:46:41PM +0100, Juri Lelli wrote: > > I'm thus now assuming that everybody is OK with the patches and that they can > > be queued for 4.10 (we certainly need this plumbing at this point). Please > > speak if my assumption is wrong (and provide feedback! :). > > Otherwise I'm going to: > > > > - use Russell's patching system for patches 2 and 8 > > - ask Sudeep to pull patches 3,5,6 and 7 > > - ask Catalin/Will to pull patches 1,4 and 9 > > I'm happy to queue patches 1, 4 and 9 for 4.10 (though it might have > been easier for the whole series to go through arm-soc). > > > Do you think we might get into trouble splitting the merge process this way? > > Probably not. The only minor downside is that I have to grab a new DT > for Juno from Sudeep to test the patches. Not an issue, though. > Thanks and apologies if merging through different trees generates some confusion. I updated arm patches to address Russell's comments. I did the same for arm64. I'll reply with the updated version, so you can see if it looks good to you as well. In case it is OK, I already updated the for-arm64 branch with the new version: git://linux-arm.org/linux-jl.git upstream/default_caps_for-arm64 Best, - Juri -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
