On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 04:46:41PM +0100, Juri Lelli wrote: > I'm thus now assuming that everybody is OK with the patches and that they can > be queued for 4.10 (we certainly need this plumbing at this point). Please > speak if my assumption is wrong (and provide feedback! :). > Otherwise I'm going to: > > - use Russell's patching system for patches 2 and 8 > - ask Sudeep to pull patches 3,5,6 and 7 > - ask Catalin/Will to pull patches 1,4 and 9 I'm happy to queue patches 1, 4 and 9 for 4.10 (though it might have been easier for the whole series to go through arm-soc). > Do you think we might get into trouble splitting the merge process this way? Probably not. The only minor downside is that I have to grab a new DT for Juno from Sudeep to test the patches. Not an issue, though. -- Catalin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html