On 10/25/2016 10:38 AM, Graham Moore wrote:
> On 10/20/2016 09:12 AM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10/20/2016 02:19 AM, Steffen Trumtrar wrote:
>>
>>>> + cdns,tslch-ns = <4>;
>>>> +
>>>> + partition@qspi-boot {
>>>> + /* 8MB for raw data. */
>>>> + label = "Flash 0 Raw Data";
>>>> + reg = <0x0 0x800000>;
>>>> + };
>>>> +
>>>> + partition@qspi-rootfs {
>>>> + /* 120MB for jffs2 data. */
>>>> + label = "Flash 0 jffs2 Filesystem";
>>>> + reg = <0x800000 0x7800000>;
>>>> + };
>>>> + };
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>
>>> What is the current preferred way of handling the partitions?
>>> This doesn't fit my Sockit configuration for example. So I would always
>>> have to patch the devicetree.
>>
>> I'm not 100% sure on this. Graham, do you have any insight?
>>>
>
> Well, strictly speaking, these partitions are only for the socdk, the
> Altera dev kit. Our sample designs and file systems expect this layout.
>
> Therefore, these partitions are not required for any other dev kits, and
> can probably be left out.
>
> Or, Steffen, if you have a standard layout you'd like to see, then put
> that in there.
>
> I think some people will have to patch the layout regardless.
>
Ok, I'll remove the partitions from the none Altera boards.
Dinh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
